Posts
hey all - well, it's been a hectic travel schedule, but we've had fun - back from Venice2 and Spain1 (where we visited Sevilla, Cadiz & Granada) - we leave tomorrow for Spain again - we start out in France (Biarritz - only for one night) - then to Spain - San Sebastian (where we meet up with our friends who just got married in L.A. at the end of last month - yes, we were just there, too!) and we all head to Cadaques, and finally Barcelona
when we get back, i finally get a few weeks to get some of OUR pics up on VOX before we shift from this apt to Zurich city where we'll be staying in a smaller apt till we leave for New Zealand in September - we wanted some time within closer walking distance of Zurich city again before we left - Switzerland is so beautiful and we definitely want to take some short trips, like to Lucerne - and then of course, we need to gather our stuff together and get it all to NZ somehow! - i've accumulated more stuffed animals and books - and you know, it's been a year! - which went awfully fast!
hope you guys are doing well:)
Biarritz, France
San Sebastian, Spain
Cadaques, Spain
Barcelona
not what i wanted to post in-between trips
just needed to mark the day
with
a pic, a song, a video
--------------
Thriller - Michael Jackson
back between our trip to the states (came back yesterday) and our 1st trip to Spain for a week - Sevilla and Granada (leaving tomorrow) - i just got a new laptop - woo hoo! - shiny! - so, at some point sooner than later, i will crank out those pics for your viewing pleasure (at least i hope so)
and so, i present - the afore mentioned inter-species interaction - brought to you by the BBC:
hey guys - well, as you may have noticed, my posts are becoming increasingly far and few between - this is not because i don't have anything to say, it's just because we've been traveling and not here so much - and, we're going to be gone quite a lot from now on till we get back to New Zealand in the Fall (Northern Hemisphere Fall, Southern Hemisphere Spring - yay, i get to do two prime Spring allergy seasons back to back - help!)
we have trips planned back to Italy, twice to Spain, back to the states (wedding - NOT Indian this time - and family), and random other little trips in between
and this Wednesday, we leave for Sweden and Scotland for a couple of weeks
so, i will not be posting much of anything, but i will post pics and stuff of where we've been, when i can:) - i will be around and answering comments, maybe leaving comments, and checking in every now and then with shorter commentary - i'll be around, but, probably won't get to post anything of much substance till we get back to Welly - so, i'm going to be doing something i don't usually do - updating you guys on my life! - rather than rant on what's going on in the world!!!
i'll leave you with a couple of pics we took in Italy last week - Alagna - Steven had to get a last ski in - the first one is the requisite Percy picture - for those of you who don't know, Percy is my faithful Orca - he was given to me in college shortly after i turned 19 - he travels absolutely everywhere with me, and only once did i almost lose him when the maid in a hotel in Sydney (Bondi Beach) took him away with the sheets!
take care:)
So, like many of you, I read a lot of news. And, inevitably, I'll come across an article where someone has done something horrid, and there's always someone who says something along the lines of, "But, they went to church and everything! We would have NEVER thought that they would do something like THIS."
And, I'm always like - okaaaaay. So, if the person was a godless heathen (i.e. an atheist - i.e ME), you people would be less shocked?
Take the person in this article I read a few days ago...
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-melissa-huckaby12-2009apr12,0,131253,full.story
This person, a Sunday school teacher, murdered one of her daughter's friends and stuffed her in a suitcase.
And, right on cue, some moron says, "It doesn't fit in with her or the family at all. The family is basically Baptist, totally churchgoing folks."
Uh huh, because if one goes to church, one can't possibly be a child-killing psycho.
GAH!!
i have very little to say in response to bigotry, prejudice and just plain stupidity any more - in my book, these people aren't sane and will never listen to reason or rationality - whether this is because of their religion, or whether they would have been this way in any case, i don't know - however, i am beginning to care less and less about the whys and wherefores - these are people who feel that giving their rights and freedoms to other people would be a threat to their freedoms - these people are dangerous
and you know what?
Screw 'em and their "Rainbow Coalition"
they can protest all they want about how this is all in the name of "love" - but, we know better...
* http://www.hrc.org/12470.htm - the Human Rights Campaign's website, where they refute the "claims" expressed by the actors in this ad
(sorry you have to cut and paste, the linky thing isn't working)
well, that's three down - only 47 to go
(i'm not counting California)
*sigh*
but, this is BIG NEWS - the first state in my "native" neck of the woods
while i don't think that Ohio is going to follow suit any time soon, i'm very pleased that Iowa Supreme Court has taken this positive initiative
and impatient
progress can't come soon enough!!!
*this comes in the wake of the news that Sweden just legalized marriage - another country down, many to go!
Stockholm - Wed, 01 Apr 2009 14:48:03 GMT - A broad majority in the Swedish parliament Wednesday approved adoption of same-sex marriage legislation after a six-hour debate. Six of the seven parties in parliament had backed the proposal drafted by the Committee on Civil Affairs to introduce a gender- neutral marriage law. Only the Christian Democrats, one of the four parties in the ruling centre-right coalition, opposed the move.
---------------
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iHUp4BkOCwXHCaN3c1RyYj61fYTQD97BM4000
DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Gay marriage, seemingly the province of the nation's two coasts, is just weeks away from becoming a reality in the heartland and apparently it will be years before social conservatives have a chance to stop it.
The Iowa Supreme Court on Friday unanimously upheld a lower-court ruling that rejected a state law restricting marriage to a union between a man and woman. Now gays and lesbians may exchange vows as soon as April 24 following the landmark decision.
The county attorney who defended the law said he would not seek a rehearing. The only recourse for opponents appeared to be a constitutional amendment, which couldn't get on the ballot until 2012 at the earliest.
"I would say the mood is one of mourning right now in a lot of ways," said a dejected Bryan English, spokesman for the Iowa Family Policy Center, a conservative group that opposes same-sex marriage.
In the meantime, same-sex marriage opponents may try to enact residency requirements for marriage so that gays and lesbians from across the country could not travel to Iowa to wed.
U.S. Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, urged the Legislature to do so, saying he feared without residency requirements Iowa would "become the gay marriage mecca."
Only Massachusetts and Connecticut currently permit same-sex marriage. For six months last year, California's high court allowed gay marriage before voters banned it in November.
For gays and lesbians, meanwhile, the day was one of jubilation. The Vermont House of Representatives also passed a measure Friday that would allow same-sex couples to wed, on a 94-52 roll call vote, just short of the two-thirds majority needed to override a promised veto by Gov. Jim Douglas.
Gay marriage supporters hoped to convince a few Vermont legislators to switch when it comes to the override vote, which could be taken as soon as Tuesday.
In Iowa, hundreds cheered, waved rainbow flags and shed tears of joy at rallies in seven cities Friday evening. "Corn-fed and Ready to Wed!" read one man's sign at a gathering at the University of Northern Iowa in Cedar Falls.
In downtown Des Moines, about 300 people gathered beneath rainbow flags to celebrate including Des Moines Mayor Frank Cownie.
"We finally have equality in Iowa," said Harold Delaria, of Des Moines, who attended the rally and has two gay children. "It's kind of the last wall of legalized discrimination and it's coming tumbling down."
The Rev. Diane McLanahan of Trinity United Methodist Church in Des Moines acknowledged that many people of faith won't agree with the ruling. With that in mind, she said the court has reached a decision that "pretty much insists that this will not be a debate about religious rights but a matter of equality and fairness."
In its ruling, the Supreme Court upheld an August 2007 decision by a judge who found that a state law limiting marriage to a man and a woman violates the constitutional rights of equal protection.
Iowa lawmakers have "excluded a historically disfavored class of persons from a supremely important civil institution without a constitutionally sufficient justification," the justices wrote.
To issue any other decision, the seven justices said, "would be an abdication of our constitutional duty."
At a news conference announcing the decision, plaintiff Kate Varnum, 34, introduced her partner, Trish Varnum, as "my fiance."
"I never thought I'd be able to say that," she said, fighting back tears.
Jason Morgan, 38, said he and his partner, Chuck Swaggerty, adopted two sons, confronted the death of Swaggerty's mother and endured a four-year legal battle as plaintiffs.
"If being together though all of that isn't love and commitment or isn't family or marriage, then I don't know what is," Morgan said. "We are very happy with the decision today and very proud to live in Iowa."
Iowa has a history of being in the forefront on social issues. It was among the first states to legalize interracial marriage and to allow married women to own property. It was also the first state to admit a woman to the bar to practice law and was a leader in school desegregation.*
Senate Majority Leader Mike Gronstal, a Democrat, said state lawmakers were unlikely to consider gay marriage legislation in this legislative session, which is expected to end within weeks.
Gronstal also said he's "not inclined" to propose a constitutional amendment during next year's session. Without a vote by the Legislature this year or next, the soonest gay marriage could be repealed would be 2014.
Amendments to Iowa's constitution must be passed by the House and Senate in two consecutive general assemblies, which each last two years, and then approved by a simple majority of voters during a general election.
Iowa's Democratic governor, Chet Culver, said he would review the decision before announcing his views.
Associated Press writers Nigel Duara in Urbandale and Marco
Santana, Melanie S. Welte, Michael Crumb and Mike Glover in Des Moines
contributed to this report.
*did not know this!
-------------------
also, some of the text of the decision: covering the argument basically that gay marriage is a danger to family values - and illuminates the hypocrisy of it all - encouraging language below, don't you think?
We begin with the County's argument that the goal of the same-sex marriage ban is to ensure children will be raised only in the optimal milieu. In pursuit of this objective, the statutory exclusion of gay and lesbian people is both under-inclusive and over-inclusive. The civil marriage statute is under-inclusive because it does not exclude from marriage other groups of parents--such as child abusers, sexual predators, parents neglecting to provide child support, and violent felons--that are undeniably less than optimal parents. Such under-inclusion tends to demonstrate that the sexual-orientation-based classification is grounded in prejudice or "overbroad generalizations about the different talents, capacities, or preferences" of gay and lesbian people, rather than having a substantial relationship to some important objective. See Virginia, 518 U.S. at 533, 116 S. Ct. at 2275, 135 L. Ed. 2d at 751 (rejecting use of overbroad generalizations to classify). If the marriage statute was truly focused on optimal parenting, many classifications of people would be excluded, not merely gay and lesbian people.-- http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2009/04/fascinating-words-iowa-court
------------------
SAME-SEX MARRIAGE
Massachusetts, Connecticut and now Iowa allow same-sex couples to marry - all the result of decisions by the states' high courts.
California briefly allowed same-sex marriage last year before a voter initiative in November repealed it. The outcome of that vote is now being challenged by lawsuits contending that the ballot measure eliminated rights that should not have been subjected to a majority vote. The state Supreme Court will rule within the next 60 days.
CIVIL UNIONS
Vermont, New Hampshire and New Jersey permit same-sex couples to enter into civil unions that entail the same rights and responsibilities as marriage, but gay-rights activists in all three states are pushing for full-fledged marriage rights.
In Vermont, the state Senate this week joined the House in voting in favor of gay marriage, though it's unclear whether a threatened veto by Gov. Jim Douglas can be overridden.
New Hampshire's House passed a marriage bill in March, which now awaits a Senate vote.
New Jersey Gov. Jon Corzine has pledged to sign a same-sex marriage bill that has been introduced in the legislature.
DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIPS
California, Oregon, Washington and the District of Columbia have domestic-partnership laws that extend many of the benefits of marriage to same-sex couples. Hawaii and Maine have more limited laws extending certain spousal rights to same-sex couples.
CONSTITUTIONAL BANS
Voters in 29 states have approved state constitutional amendments that ban same-sex marriage: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Georgia, Florida, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Wisconsin.
Hawaii voters approved a constitutional amendment empowering the Legislature to outlaw same-sex marriage; lawmakers did so in 1998.
- Associated Press
i never pay a moment's attention to beauty pageants (and i'm really refraining myself from saying anything snarky) - but, i caught the title of this article out of the corner of my eye while surfing Alternet recently and i had to share
all i have to say is - way to go, Miss Segura - after reading this, you'd think Gitmo was paradise on earth - and not at all a place where some of the most horrific crimes against human rights in this decade have taken place
really, sometimes, wtf!
*p.s. if you click on the link to the original post as provided below, they have taken off the remarks and replaced them with an "official statement"
-----------------------------------------
http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/134175/omg_gitmo!_miss_universe_visits_guantanamo_bay,_finds_it_%27relaxing%27_%27calm_and_beautiful%27/?comments=layout#comments
OMG Gitmo! Miss Universe Visits Guantanamo Bay, Finds it 'Relaxing' 'Calm and Beautiful'
By Liliana Segura, AlterNet
Posted on March 30, 2009, Printed on April 1, 2009
http://www.alternet.org/bloggers/www.alternet.org/134175/
This post originally appeared in PEEK.
Ever wondered what it takes to be Miss Universe? Thanks to Venezuela's Dayana Mendoza, we can now be sure it's not a finely tuned sense of current events. The reigning beauty queen visited Guantanamo Bay last week, courtesy of the U.S.O, and, in a truly astonishing feat of self-parody, wrote the following description of her trip, including rave reviews of the jails, the military dogs, and of course, the beaches.
I am posting it in its entirety, in case the original post is removed for being just too damn embarrassing to beauty queens everywhere. (Perhaps somewhere Miss Teen South Carolina is feeling a little bit better.)
(H/T to Arun Gupta for not allowing this to go unnoticed.)
This week, Guantanamo!!! It was an incredible experience.
We arrived in Gitmo on Friday and stared going around the town, everybody knew Crystle [Stewart, Miss USA] and I were coming so the first thing we did was attend a big lunch and then we visited one of the bars they have in the base. We talked about Gitmo and what is was like living there. The next days we had a wonderful time, this truly was a memorable trip! We hung out with the guys from the East Coast and they showed us the boat inside and out, how they work and what they do, we took a ride around the land and it was a loooot of fun!
We also met the Military dogs, and they did a very nice
demonstration of their skills. All the guys from the Army were amazing
with us.
We visited the Detainees camps and we saw
the jails, where they shower, how the recreate themselves with movies,
classes of art, books. It was very interesting.
We
took a ride with the Marines around the land to see the division of
Gitmo and Cuba while they were informed us with a little bit of history.
The
water in Guantanamo Bay is soooo beautiful! It was unbelievable, we
were able to enjoy it for at least an hour. We went to the glass beach,
and realized the name of it comes from the little pieces of broken
glass from hundred of years ago. It is pretty to see all the colors
shining with the sun. That day we met a beautiful lady named Rebeca who
does wonders with the glasses from the beach. She creates jewelry with
it and of course I bought a necklace from her that will remind me off
Guantanamo Bay :)
I didn't want to leave, it was such a relaxing place, so calm and beautiful.
I was back in NY on Wednesday and on Thursday I did some paper work at the office and went out for dinner. On Friday I flew to Miami for the weekend because I had a photo shoot for the magazine People en Espanol. So hopefully I might be a little lucky and have some time off to take the sun for a while :)
Liliana Segura is a staff writer and editor of AlterNet's Rights and Liberties and War on Iraq Special Coverage.